Compare the right sources
Ask AYBE to cross-reference OEM guidance, internal analyses, existing PM documents, and work-order evidence.
Coverage review
Find the maintenance work your current PM programme misses.
Compare manuals, FMEA outputs, existing PM documents, and work-order history to expose missing, weak, or under-specified coverage.
A
AYBE / NEXPHASE AIMaintenance source ↔ current PMA gap is a decision point: investigate it, accept it, or close it with a better task.
BUILT FOR THE WORK BETWEEN THE FAILURE AND THE FIX
DOCUMENTS+WORK ORDERS+ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT
What changes
Less hunting. Better questions.
More defensible work.
Name the missing detail
Surface absent tasks, unclear intervals, missing procedures, and failure modes that are not represented in current PM coverage.
Prioritise review
Use the findings to focus engineering attention where a source conflict or uncovered failure mode could matter most.
A practical workflow
From source material
to engineering review.
NexPhase helps you move faster without hiding the decisions that still belong with your team.
Define the comparison
Choose the asset or system and provide the maintenance sources that should agree with one another.
Ask for the gaps
Have AYBE compare tasks, intervals, failure modes, controls, procedures, and parts across those sources.
Close the loop
Review each finding, document the decision, and update the PM programme where the evidence supports a change.
Clear boundaries
Useful intelligence,
not false certainty.
What counts as a PM gap?+
A gap may be a missing task, an under-specified procedure or interval, or a failure mode in an analysis that is not addressed by current maintenance coverage.
Can gap analysis prove a programme is complete?+
No. It helps reveal discrepancies across the sources you provide. Engineering review remains essential, especially for critical equipment.
The next useful question is closer than you think.